Data Management Plan (DMPTool) Training Coming This Fall

This fall, the OER will host a DMPTool training for COE faculty. Information on the DMPTool training will be available soon. Data management plans (DMPs) are now becoming a standard part of grant proposals for most funding agencies. The DMP should address the entire life cycle of the data. Some components of a DMP include data types, metadata, legal and ethical issues, data sharing, and data preservation.

The DMPTool helps you through the process of generating a comprehensive DMP tailored to specific funding agency requirements. The DMPTool also allows multiple users to access the plan during the development process, so other members of the grant team can provide input. Once you have created a DMP template, it can be saved for use on subsequent grant proposals. A fun caricature of what not to do is shown in this YouTube video by the New York University Health Sciences Library Data Sharing and Management Snafu in 3 Short Acts courtesy of DMPTool Trainer Hannah Norton, UF Reference and Liaison Librarian.

Secure On-Site Data Disposal Service

UF requires the destruction of old data on any electronic equipment that is discarded, transferred, or reused. UF has an on-site media disposal and shredding service available for faculty and staff. The service is available at the Health Science Center (in the Communicore Building) and at the Hub. Items accepted for secure disposal include the following: CDs and DVDs, USB flash drives and memory sticks, cell phones, camera memory cards, microfiche and film, external hard drives, floppy disks, tapes, and removed internal hard drives. If you have any items with stored data that you want to discard, this is the way to do it safely and quickly. Learn more about the process in this UF Information Technology news article.

Awarded Projects for July 2014

College of Education
Awarded Projects
July 2014
Principal Investigator: Marisa Stukey (P. K. Yonge)
Co-PI: Ashley Pennypacker-Hill  (P. K. Yonge)
Funding Agency: Florida Department of Education
Project Title: Title II, Part A, Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting 2014-2015
Project Period: 7/1/2014 – 6/30/2015
Award Amount: $24,956
Principal Investigator: Philip Poekert (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: School Board of Duval County
Project Title: Duval County Certified Instructional Leadership Coaching Program
Project Period: 6/20/2014 – 6/1/2015
Award Amount: $98,000
Principal Investigator: Donald Pemberton (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: Susan Butler (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Funding Agency: University of Florida Foundation
Project Title: Job-embedded Professional Development for Palm Beach County Elementary STEM Teachers
Project Period: 6/1/2014 – 5/31/2016
Award Amount: $470,000

Submitted Projects for July 2014

College of Education
Submitted Projects
July 2014
Principal Investigator: Donald Pemberton (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Florida Office of Early Learning
Proposal Title: VPK POP Course Development
Requested Amount: $120,000
Principal Investigator: Philip Poekert (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: School Board of Duval County
Proposal Title: Duval County Certified Instructional Leadership Coaching Program
Requested Amount: $98,000
Principal Investigator: Ivan Mutis (Rinker School of Construction Management)
Co-PI: Pavlo Antonenko (STL)
Funding Agency: National Science Foundation
Proposal Title: nD Capsules: Boundary Objects to Connect Contextual Information in Informal Learning Environments Using Augmented Reality Technologies
Requested Amount: $40,644
Principal Investigator: Feihong Wang (SESPECS/CEECS)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Foundation for Child Development
Proposal Title: Task Engagement Behaviors of Young Children from Rural Families: Relationships with Structural and Process Features of the Home and Childcare Environments and Learning-Related Outcomes
Requested Amount: $219,960
Principal Investigator: Carole R. Beal (STL)
Co-PI: Donald Pemberton (Lastinger Center for Learning); Juan Gilbert (Computer & Information Science & Engineering)
Funding Agency: US Department of Education/IES
Proposal Title: Virtual Learning Lab
Requested Amount: $8,832,035
Principal Investigator: Mary Brownell (SESPECS)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Vail School District (Subcontract) (IES)
Proposal Title: Learning Together in a Virtual Space: An Effective, Comprehensive Online Professional Learning System for Special Educators and Paraprofessionals
Requested Amount: $57,513
Principal Investigator: Mary Brownell (SESPECS)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Boston University (Subcontract) (IES)
Proposal Title: Validating an Observation Protocol for the Evaluation of Special Educators
Requested Amount: $200,058
Principal Investigator: Maureen Conroy (SESPECS/CEECS)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: US Department of Education/IES
Proposal Title: BEST in CLASS Web: A Web-based Intervention Supporting Early Childhood Teachers’ Use of Evidence-based Practices with Young Children at Risk for Emotional/Behavioral Disorders
Requested Amount: $1,500,000
Principal Investigator: Maureen Conroy (SESPECS/CEECS)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Virginia Commonwealth University (Subcontract) (IES)
Proposal Title: BEST in CLASS – Elementary: A Preventative Classroom-based Model
Requested Amount: $265,347
Principal Investigator: Ann Daunic (SESPECS)
Co-PI: Nancy Corbett (SESPECS); Stephen Smith (SESPECS)
Funding Agency: US Department of Education/IES
Proposal Title: Evaluating a Social-Emotional Learning Curriculum for K-1 Children at Risk for Emotional or Behavioral Disorders
Requested Amount: $3,499,664
Principal Investigator: Alice Kaye Emery (SESPECS)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Florida Department of Education
Proposal Title: Working with the Experts Project (Part B) 2014-2015
Requested Amount: $175,000
Principal Investigator: Holly Lane (SESPECS)
Co-PI: Nicholas Gage (SESPECS)
Funding Agency: University of Washington (Subcontract) (IES)
Proposal Title: Collaborative Advancement of Rural Education through Effective Online Professional Development: Project CARE
Requested Amount: $406,335
Principal Investigator: James McLeskey (SESPECS)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: University of Kentucky Research Foundation (Subcontract) (IES)
Proposal Title: BREATHE: A Burnout Intervention for Special Education Teachers
Requested Amount: $115,159
Principal Investigator: Donald Pemberton (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: Susan Butler (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Funding Agency: University of Florida Foundation
Proposal Title: Job-embedded Professional Development for Palm Beach County Elementary STEM Teachers
Requested Amount: $470,000
Principal Investigator: Stephen Smith (SESPECS)
Co-PI: Ann Daunic (SESPECS)
Funding Agency: SRI International (Subcontract) (IES)
Proposal Title: Effectiveness Study of Tools for Getting Along: Teaching Students to Problem Solve
Requested Amount: $595,444
Principal Investigator: Sondra Smith (SHDOSE)
Co-PI: Walter Leite (SHDOSE)
Funding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services/OPRE
Proposal Title: BSF Programs: Mediating Effects of Parental Stress and Couple Quality on the Relationship between Adversity and Child Outcomes (Project: MEDIATING CHILD OUTCOMES)
Requested Amount: $96,449
Principal Investigator: Patricia Snyder (SESPECS/CEECS)
Co-PI: Mary McLean (SESPECS/CEECS); James Algina (SESPECS/CEECS)
Funding Agency: US Department of Education/IES
Proposal Title: Impact of Professional Development on Preschool Teachers’ Use of Embedded-Instruction Practices: An Efficacy Trial of Tools for Teachers
Requested Amount: $3,498,113

Support for Principal Investigators

Everyone in the OER is fully engaged in PI support services! We are currently drafting boilerplate materials for data management/security, cost analysis, and dissemination plans for all outgoing IES proposals. Stay tuned for upcoming announcements. In the meantime, we want to make the following resources available to everyone preparing proposals:

UF Libraries Data Management Basics

Data Management Planning (DMP) Tool– UF has a data management tool available for PIs. Through the link, you can sign in using your Gatorlink and choose from prepopulated funding agency guidelines for applicable templates.

UF Office of Research Proposal Preparation Information website

As always, let us know how we can help!

Writing about Research Concepts in Everyday Language

Making complex research concepts easily accessible to policymakers and practitioners can be challenging for researchers who have been trained to write for an academic audience.

A recent report prepared for the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Going Public: Writing about Research in Everyday Language, describes three techniques for writing more plainly about study design, measurement, and data analysis:

1. Making concepts simpler — how to use simple language to convey research concepts while ensuring they convey the same meaning.

2. Writing for the general reader — how to determine what the reader really needs to know. Clarity about key messages can lead to simpler and more direct writing.

3. Writing to reduce misinterpretation — how to minimize the likelihood that readers will misinterpret research concepts by considering the possible areas of confusion and addressing them directly.

The report includes a glossary that shows how to apply these approaches to writing about commonly used concepts in impact research such as regression analysis and effect size.

This report was prepared for the IES by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE).

Reprinted from IES News Flash, publishing up-to-date alerts about breaking news from IES, its centers, and various programs.

Awarded Projects for June 2014

College of Education – Awarded Projects – June 2014
Principal Investigator: Donald Pemberton (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Early Learning Coalition of Duval County
Project Title: ELC Duval TA Coaching Program
Project Period: 5/1/2014 – 6/30/2015
Award Amount: $62,920
Principal Investigator: Philip Poekert (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Early Learning Coalition of Broward County, Inc.
Project Title: ELC Broward Community of Practice Facilitation Training
Project Period: 4/1/2014 – 12/31/2014
Award Amount: $46,000
Principal Investigator: Marisa Stukey (P.K. Yonge)
Co-PI: Ashley Pennypacker-Hill (P.K. Yonge)
Funding Agency: Florida Department of Education
Project Title: Transforming Mathematics
Project Period: 4/18/2014 – 9/30/2014
Award Amount: $2,043.43

Submitted Projects for June 2014

College of Education – Submitted Projects – June 2014
Principal Investigator:  Lynda Hayes (P.K. Yonge)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency:  Florida Department of Education
Proposal Title: IDEA, Part B, Entitlement 2014-2015
Requested Amount: $219,628
Principal Investigator: Lynda Hayes (P.K. Yonge)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Florida Department of Education
Proposal Title: Title I, Part A
Requested Amount: $143,553
Principal Investigator: Marisa Stukey (P.K. Yonge)
Co-PI: Ashley Pennypacker-Hill (P.K. Yonge)
Funding Agency: Florida Department of Education
Proposal Title: Title II
Requested Amount: $24,490
Principal Investigator: Mary McLean (CEECS/SESPECS)
Co-PI: Patricia Snyder (CEECS/SESPECS); Maureen Conroy (CEECS/SESPECS)
Funding Agency: University of Washington (Subcontract/DHHS)
Proposal Title: NCQTL Year 5
Requested Amount: $237,251
Principal Investigator: David Therriault (SHDOSE)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Omninox Publishing (Subcontract/NSF)
Proposal Title: A.L.I.C.E. (Adaptive Learning through Innovative Coursework and Experimentation)
Requested Amount: $18,261
Principal Investigator: Thomas Dana – Administration (Dean’s Area)
Co-PI: Daniel McCoy – Administration (Dean’s Area)
Funding Agency: Sabreliner Aviation
Proposal Title: Corrosion Sciences Education Distance Learning Curriculum Development
Requested Amount: $699,918
Principal Investigator: Donald Pemberton (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: US Department of Education/FIPSE
Proposal Title: Florida First in the World: Creating a College Access and Completion Movement
Requested Amount: $1,131,544
Principal Investigator: Donald Pemberton (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Early Learning Coalition of Duval County
Proposal Title: ELC Duval TA Coaching Program
Requested Amount: $62,920

Summer Proposal Submissions

Faculty in the COE are submitting 20 proposals this summer, including 13 IES proposals — a record number — with the same August 7 deadline. To accommodate IES submissions, the OER requested that PIs schedule an appointment time with Brian to ensure all proposals are finalized and uploaded successfully before the deadline. We want to thank everyone for communicating with Brian to confirm a date.

Considering the overall number of proposals in the queue, we encourage all PIs with summer submissions to schedule an appointment time with Brian even for proposals not being submitted to IES.

If you are planning any submissions this summer and have not already let us know, please contact us and submit early consultation and capital needs forms to Ana and Brian as soon as possible.  Please also let Ana know if you will need editorial support from Patti Casey. As always, the earlier you start working with us the better.

We anticipate another banner year for the COE!

Recent Legislative Action Affects IES

In April, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce reported on the Strengthening Education through Research Act (H.R. 4366). The bill, passed by the House of Representatives in May, amends several provisions related to the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) including independence, research standards, technical assistance, evaluation, privacy protection, oversight of student assessment, and IES accountability.

Below are some highlights of the changes:

  • H.R. 4366 amends the definition of “scientifically based research standards,” renaming it to “principles of scientific research.” IES-supported research should adhere to the new definition of these principles allowing for “strong claims of causal relationships” only with research designs that eliminate plausible competing explanations for results, although the definition explicitly does not limit such claims to research employing random-assignment experiments.
  • H.R. 4366 adjusts the specified topical research priorities for IES, preserving language authorizing research on educational problems and issues relevant to the goals and requirements of major federal educational laws such as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and Higher Education Act (HEA). In addition, H.R. 4366 authorizes research focused on improving the quality of early childhood and elementary and secondary education, as well as research focused on access to opportunities for and completion of postsecondary education. Some more narrowly targeted priorities that are specified under current law would no longer be specified.
  • H.R. 4366 eliminates the requirement that there be “not less than 8” national research and development centers supported by the National Center for Education Research (NCER) as well as language naming specific topics of research to be supported by these centers.
  • H.R. 4366 explicitly identifies the mission of the regional educational laboratories (RELs) as conducting applied research, development, evaluation, and dissemination activities, and developing the capacity of state educational agencies (SEAs) and local educational agencies (LEAs) to carry out such activities. It also specifies processes for ensuring that the work of such RELs is responsive to the needs of the region served and eliminates their role in providing other types of training and technical assistance.
  • H.R. 4366 designates IES as the primary entity responsible for conducting research on and evaluations of federal education programs and programs within the Department of Education, aiming to ensure rigor and independence of such research and evaluation.
  • H.R. 4366 authorizes a new performance management system that aims to promote continuous improvement of activities and effective use of funds through the required development and use of measurable performance indicators that would be designed to gauge the effectiveness of IES activities and their utility in terms of meeting stakeholders’ needs.
  • H.R. 4366 requires that renewal of all IES-supported grants be contingent on the results of evaluations tied to the performance management system.
  • H.R. 4366 authorizes appropriations for the Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA), Educational Technical Assistance Act (ETAA), and National Assessment of Educational Progress Authorization Act (NAEPAA) at specific levels for each of FY2015 through FY2020, rather than for the first fiscal year and such sums as necessary for subsequent fiscal years as under current law. The bill sets all authorized amounts for FY2015 at the same level as amounts appropriated for FY2014, with increases in subsequent years as follows: 0.2% for FY2016, 2.2% for FY2017, 2.4% for FY2018, 2.7% for FY2019, and 2.5% for FY2020.
  • H.R. 4366 authorizes appropriations for the RELs at 16.13% of funds appropriated for ESRA, rather than at $100,000 and such sums as necessary for the five succeeding years as under current law. In FY2014, the RELs received $54,423,000, or 16.13% of the amount authorized under H.R. 4366 for FY2015.

Excerpted from the Congressional Research Service report The Education Sciences Reform Act.

NIH Policy Changes and Items of Interest

Changes in Resubmission Policy

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is now allowing researchers more than one chance to revise a rejected grant application before having to start over with a new idea. While the new policy still allows a single resubmission per application, ideas that were unsuccessfully submitted as a resubmission may now be presented in a new grant application without having to substantially redesign the content and scope of the project. Reviewers will be instructed to review it as a new idea even if they have seen it in prior cycles. The applicant will not be required to describe how the application has changed or respond to previous reviews although NIH expects that applicants will nevertheless take advantage of previous reviewers’ comments to strengthen the applications for each submission.

Please visit the NIH site for more information about the new resubmission policy.

Changes to the Biosketch Format

NIH is piloting a new biosketch format emphasizing the researcher’s accomplishments instead of just a list of publications. The primary focus of the new biosketch will be the magnitude and significance of the scientific advances associated with a researcher’s discoveries and the specific role the researcher played in those findings. The new format will extend the page limit from four to five pages. Use of this enhanced biosketch format is restricted to those Requests for Applications (RFAs) included in the pilot. The current series of pilot RFAs will be issued over the next few months. The information collected in the current pilot will be used along with findings previously collected to inform the roll-out of the modified biosketch for all NIH grant applications planned for FY 2016 and beyond.

Please visit the NIH site for more information about the new biosketch format.

The following was excerpted from NIH eSubmission Items of Interest.

Support for Applications with More Than Five Budget Periods

Although NIH typically allows only five budget periods to be submitted with grant applications, occasionally a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) will allow more than five budget periods. NIH’s electronic Research Administration (eRA Commons) is the online interface where PIs and co-PIs can access and share administrative information relating to their grants. eRA Commons has just added system support for the R&R Budget 10YR Grants.gov form that will allow for the collection of up to 10 budget periods of data. Going forward, this form will be included with the few, special FOAs that allow more than five budget periods. The bulk of NIH FOAs will continue to use the standard R&R Budget form.

Transition to FORMS-C to Complete in August

NIH has transitioned to using updated electronic application forms (FORMS-C). The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs are the last remaining programs to use the older forms. These programs are scheduled to transition to FORMS-C for due dates on/after August 5, 2014.

New Cover Letter Form for FORMS-C

NIH form packages no longer use a separate, agency-specific PHS Cover Letter form.  The version of the SF424 (R&R) cover form included in FORMS-C packages has a new Cover Letter Attachment (item #21 at the bottom of the form). Applicants planning to include a cover letter with the application should use this Cover Letter Attachment only. The eRA system will keep this attachment separate from the assembled application image and limit access to it. If it is attached someplace else (e.g., Pre-application attachment on the SF424 R&R cover form, Other Attachments on the R&R Other Project Information form), it will become part of the assembled application image and will be visible to everyone with access to the application including reviewers.

Using Non-standard Characters in Form Fields

Although NIH systems now support a broader character set including Greek and other non-standard characters, Grants.gov systems currently do not. When completing application form fields, applicants should type content directly from the keyboard to avoid cutting and pasting from Word and other word processors which often convert plain text to rich text.

It is best to keep the text as simple as possible limiting the use of characters to letters, numbers, spaces, underscores, and standard punctuation marks and reserving the use of fancier characters to the body of the PDF attachments.

Review of eSubmission Basics

  • Watch out for form fields required by NIH that are not marked required on federal-wide forms (e.g., Credential for PD/PIs and Organization for all entries on R&R Sr/Key Person Profile form; primary site DUNS on Project/Performance Sites form).
  • Use PDF format for all attachments. Follow PDF Guidelines.
  • Submit early – days, not minutes – to allow time to correct unforeseen errors.
  • Track the submission in eRA Commons. Email can be unreliable.
  • Check the entire assembled application image in eRA Commons. If you can’t view it, NIH can’t review it!
  • If federal system issues threaten on-time submission, notify the help desk and follow the Guidelines for Applicants Experiencing System Issues.

 

Submitted Projects for May 2014

College of Education – Submitted Projects – May 2014
Principal Investigator: Magdalena Castaneda (STL)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Miami-Dade County Public Schools – MDCPS
Proposal Title: Job-Embedded Professional Development through Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Requested Amount: $58,402
Principal Investigator: Sondra Smith (SHDOSE)
Co-PI: Jacqueline Swank (SHDOSE)
Funding Agency: US Department of Justice/OJP/NIJ
Proposal Title: Support Networks in Bullying Prevention
Requested Amount: $378,670
Principal Investigator: Jacqueline Swank (SHDOSE)
Co-PI: Joseph Gagnon (SESPECS)
Funding Agency: US Department of Justice/OJP/NIJ
Proposal Title: Development and Evaluation of an Intervention for Trauma Counseling and Support in Juvenile Corrections
Requested Amount: $627,270

Grant Writing Workshop: Contacting the Grant Program Officer

The UF Office of Research recently hosted a two-day grant writing workshop presented by Dr. Robert Porter of GrantWinners Seminars. This article summarizes the topic of “Contacting the Grant Program Officer.”

Grant writing “heavy hitters” agree that communication with the grant program officer is the best possible investment of your time.

  • Published material in the RFP is the “official line.”
  • Review panels and program officers develop unspoken preferences.
  • Program priorities can change over time.
  • Program officer’s response to core theme is the best predictor of success.
  • Program officers can advise on issues related to program track, budget, collaborations, and project structure.
  • Unofficial “rules of the game” can separate winners from losers.

It is acceptable to discuss your project before you have written the proposal. In fact, program officers welcome inquiries in order to

  • Keep up with new directions in the field;
  • Deflect weak or inappropriate proposals;
  • Encourage and coach good ideas;
  • Scout for new grant reviewers.

How to Plan for a Successful Encounter with a Program Officer

1. Find the best “fit.”

  • Develop funding search skills.
  • Study program mission statement.
  • Search recent awards. Read abstracts.
  • Look up staff directory.

2. Write a pre-abstract or “elevator speech.”

  • Keep it brief, informal.
  • Specify goals, method, and outcomes.
  • Emphasize uniqueness and contribution to the field.
  • Rewrite and rehearse.

3. Start with an e-mail.

  • Multiple addresses are okay.
  • Concise and brief: 2 – 3 paragraphs.
  • To argue fit, borrow terminology from the office mission or RFP.
  • End with a key question: “Is this the kind of project your program would consider funding?”

4. Study the e-mail response.

  • Look for tone and nuance as well as a direct message.
  • Take all suggestions as instructions.
  • Best result: Program officer requests more information or white paper.
  • Also good: Program officer recommends a completely different program.
  • If encouraged, plan for a phone call.

5. Make the call.

  • Remind the program officer of your project and e-mail.
  • Write out questions in advance.
  • Key questions include the following:
  1. Does my project fit your current priorities?
  2. What would you recommend to improve my chances?
  3. What is the anticipated success ratio?
  4. Do you expect last year’s average award to change this year?
  5. What are some of the common reasons proposals are rejected?
  • Listen for “buying signals.”
  • Follow up with a “thank you” note summarizing key points.
  • Offer to serve on a review panel.
  • Stay in touch.
  • Ask for a meeting (if practical).

Please look for additional summaries of workshop topics in upcoming issues of the Research Bulletin.

Session recordings are available online. Those who require copies of the handouts for any/all sessions may request them by emailing Jenn Hubbs at hubbsj@ufl.edu with their name, on-campus PO Box, and session(s) of interest.

Research Event in June 2014

COE faculty and doctoral students are cordially invited to attend:

“Tales of a Fulbright Scholarship: Incarcerated and Disadvantaged Youth in South Africa”

with Dr. Joseph C. Gagnon

Monday, June 2, 2014
11:30 pm – 1:00 pm
Terrace Room

Bring your brown bag lunch. Refreshments will be provided.

RSVP to Rosie Connolly by Friday, May 30th: rconnolly@coe.ufl.edu

Awarded Projects for April 2014

College of Education – Awarded Projects – April 2014
Principal Investigator: Philip Poekert (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: SRI International (Subcontract)
Project Title: Validation of SunBay Middle School Mathematics
Project Period: 1/1/2014 – 12/31/2017
Award Amount: $2,241,002
Principal Investigator: Philip Poekert (Lastinger Center for Learning)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: The School Board of Miami-Dade County
Project Title: M-DCPS/Kellogg i3 Match
Project Period: 10/1/2012 – 6/30/2015
Award Amount: $574,026.59
Principal Investigator: Bruce MacFadden (Florida Museum of Natural History)
Co-PI: Kent Crippen (STL)
Funding Agency: National Science Foundation
Project Title: FOSSIL: Fostering Opportunities for Synergistic STEM with Informal Learners
Project Period: 11/23/2013 – 11/22/2017
Award Amount: $252,941
Principal Investigator: Marisa Stukey (P.K. Yonge)
Co-PI: N/A
Funding Agency: Developmental Studies Center
Project Title: The Collaborative Classroom
Project Period: 3/17/2014 – 7/31/2014
Award Amount: $12,000
Principal Investigator: Danling Fu (STL)
Co-PI: Cynthia Chennault (Languages, Literatures, and Culture)
Funding Agency: National Security Agency
Project Title: Florida STARTALK 2014 for Teachers of Chinese, K-16
Project Period: 4/10/2014 – 2/28/2015
Award Amount: $77,191